Design and Implementation of an IoT-Based Automatic Salted Fish Dryer System Using Load Cell as an Objective Moisture Indicator

Darmiati; Abdullah Hanif; Agus Triyono

doi:10.59934/jaiea.v6i1.2703

Authors

Darmiati Department of Computer Engineering Technology, Department of Information Technology, Politeknik Negeri Samarinda, Samarinda, Indonesia
Abdullah Hanif Department of Computer Engineering Technology, Department of Information Technology, Politeknik Negeri Samarinda, Samarinda, Indonesia
Agus Triyono Department of Computer Engineering Technology, Department of Information Technology, Politeknik Negeri Samarinda, Samarinda, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59934/jaiea.v6i1.2703

Keywords:

Automatic Dryer, ESP32, Internet of Things, Load Cell, Saalter Fish

Abstract

Fish is a highly nutritious but rapidly perishable food commodity. Traditional salted fish drying methods heavily depend on unpredictable weather conditions, often taking days to complete and leaving the product prone to contamination. While automated dryers have been introduced, most lack an objective metric to halt the process, relying instead on subjective visual inspection. This study aims to design and implement an Internet of Things (IoT)-based automatic salted fish dryer system equipped with a load cell to objectively determine the dryness level. The proposed system utilizes an ESP32 microcontroller, a DHT22 sensor, a PTC heater, and a DC fan to automatically maintain the drying chamber at an optimal temperature of 70°C. Furthermore, a load cell sensor continuously monitors weight reduction, serving as a real-time proxy for the moisture content. Operational data is transmitted via Wi-Fi to the ThingsBoard platform for remote visualization. System validation showed that the DHT22 and load cell sensors have an accuracy of over 99.20%. Experimental results on 1 kg of Sepat and Layang fish demonstrate that the automated system significantly accelerates the drying process, reducing the required time from 2-3 days to just 8 hours. The system successfully executed an automatic cut-off when the fish weight dropped by 50%, ensuring hygienic, efficient, and consistent production for small-to-medium enterprises.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

N. Fitri et al., ‘A Comprehensive Review on the Processing of Dried Fish and the Associated Chemical and Nutritional Changes’, Foods, vol. 11, no. 19, p. 2938, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.3390/foods11192938.

W. Wu et al., ‘Recent Advances in Drying Processing Technologies for Aquatic Products’, Processes, vol. 12, no. 5, p. 942, May 2024, doi: 10.3390/pr12050942.

Y. M. T. N. Apituley, R. Risky, and H. Nanlohy, ‘Margin and Marketing Efficiency of Salted Fish of Parigi Hamlet Central Maluku Regency’, Bus. Rev. Case Stud., Aug. 2024, doi: 10.17358/brcs.5.2.245.

A. E. Elwakeel et al., ‘Drying kinetics and thermo-environmental analysis of a PV-operated tracking indirect solar dryer for tomato slices’, PLOS ONE, vol. 19, no. 10, p. e0306281, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306281.

R. Guerrero et al., ‘A Microcontroller-based Fish Drying System for Enhanced Drying Time with Real-Time Environmental Monitoring’, JEECS J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–8, May 2026, doi: 10.54732/jeecs.v11i1.1.

K. Usmanov, N. Yakubova, S. Sultanova, and Z. Turakulov, ‘Fuzzy-Logic-Based Intelligent Control of a Cabinet Solar Dryer for Plantago major Leaves Under Real Climatic Conditions in Tashkent’, in ECP 2025, MDPI, Jan. 2026, p. 35. doi: 10.3390/engproc2025117035.

R. Muradi and K. Kartika, ‘Fish Dryer With Temperature Control Using the Fuzzy Logic Method’, Int. J. Eng. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.52088/ijesty.v3i1.403.

T. Yang, X. Zheng, H. Xiao, C. Shan, and J. Zhang, ‘Moisture content online detection system based on multi-sensor fusion and convolutional neural network’, Front. Plant Sci., vol. 15, p. 1289783, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1289783.

R. Rani et al., ‘The Impact of Drying and Salting on the Fish Resilience and Quality’, Int. J. Nat. Sci. Eng., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 30–36, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.23887/ijnse.v6i1.41473.

A. F. Hastawan et al., ‘Comparison of testing load cell sensor data sampling method based on the variation of time delay’, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 700, no. 1, p. 012018, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/700/1/012018.

Y. A. Ahmad, T. Surya Gunawan, H. Mansor, B. A. Hamida, A. Fikri Hishamudin, and F. Arifin, ‘On the Evaluation of DHT22 Temperature Sensor for IoT Application’, in 2021 8th International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: IEEE, Jun. 2021, pp. 131–134. doi: 10.1109/ICCCE50029.2021.9467147.

J. A. Abdinoor et al., ‘Performance of Low-Cost Air Temperature Sensors and Applied Calibration Techniques—A Systematic Review’, Atmosphere, vol. 16, no. 7, p. 842, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.3390/atmos16070842.

K. Aytaç and Ö. Korçak, ‘IoT based intelligence for proactive waste management in Quick Service Restaurants’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 284, p. 125401, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125401.

R. Poudel, N. Dutta, and N. Karak, ‘A mechanically robust biodegradable bioplastic of citric acid modified plasticized yam starch with anthocyanin as a fish spoilage auto-detecting smart film’, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., vol. 242, p. 125020, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125020.

D. Yulizar, S. Soekirno, N. Ananda, M. A. Prabowo, I. F. P. Perdana, and D. Aofany, ‘Performance Analysis Comparison of DHT11, DHT22 and DS18B20 as Temperature Measurement’, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Science Education and Sciences 2022 (ICSES 2022), vol. 8, A. Doyan, S. Hadisaputra, M. M. A. Kechik, M. R. Bilad, C.-M. Wei, and Susilawati, Eds, in Advances in Physics Research, vol. 8. , Dordrecht: Atlantis Press International BV, 2023, pp. 37–45. doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-232-3_5.